Termination of the given ITRSProblem could not be shown:



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

ITRS problem:
The following domains are used:

z

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(>=@z(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(FALSE, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(=@z(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(TRUE, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(TRUE, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(FALSE, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → 0@z
sort(nil) → nil

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(FALSE, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(TRUE, x0, x1, x2)
if2(TRUE, x0, x1, x2)
if1(FALSE, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)


Represented integers and predefined function symbols by Terms

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))


Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → IF1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → GREATEREQ_INT(x, y)
IF2(false, x, y, xs) → DEL(x, xs)
SORT(cons(x, xs)) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs)))
SORT(cons(x, xs)) → DEL(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))
DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → IF2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → EQUAL_INT(x, y)
IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))
GREATEREQ_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
GREATEREQ_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(neg(x), neg(y))
EQUAL_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
EQUAL_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → IF1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → GREATEREQ_INT(x, y)
IF2(false, x, y, xs) → DEL(x, xs)
SORT(cons(x, xs)) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs)))
SORT(cons(x, xs)) → DEL(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))
DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → IF2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → EQUAL_INT(x, y)
IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))
GREATEREQ_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
GREATEREQ_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(neg(x), neg(y))
EQUAL_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
EQUAL_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 7 SCCs with 4 less nodes.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQUAL_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQUAL_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQUAL_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

EQUAL_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(neg(x), neg(y))
No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(EQUAL_INT(x1, x2)) = 2·x1 + x2   
POL(neg(x1)) = x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 2·x1   



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ PisEmptyProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQUAL_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQUAL_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EQUAL_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

EQUAL_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → EQUAL_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(EQUAL_INT(x1, x2)) = 2·x1 + x2   
POL(pos(x1)) = x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 2·x1   



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ PisEmptyProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATEREQ_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATEREQ_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATEREQ_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

GREATEREQ_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(neg(x), neg(y))
No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(GREATEREQ_INT(x1, x2)) = 2·x1 + x2   
POL(neg(x1)) = x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 2·x1   



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ PisEmptyProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATEREQ_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATEREQ_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATEREQ_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

GREATEREQ_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATEREQ_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(GREATEREQ_INT(x1, x2)) = 2·x1 + x2   
POL(pos(x1)) = x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 2·x1   



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ PisEmptyProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → IF2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
IF2(false, x, y, xs) → DEL(x, xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → IF2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
IF2(false, x, y, xs) → DEL(x, xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

DEL(x, cons(y, xs)) → IF2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
IF2(false, x, y, xs) → DEL(x, xs)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs: 



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → IF1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → IF1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → IF1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MAX(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → IF1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(IF1(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = 1 + x4   
POL(MAX(x1)) = x1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(false) = 0   
POL(greatereq_int(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(neg(x1)) = 0   
POL(pos(x1)) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(true) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF1(true, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(x, xs))
IF1(false, x, y, xs) → MAX(cons(y, xs))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

del(x, nil) → nil
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
sort(cons(x, xs)) → cons(max(cons(x, xs)), sort(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))))
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(nil) → pos(0)
sort(nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
sort(cons(x0, x1))
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
sort(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

sort(cons(x0, x1))
sort(nil)



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [LPAR04] the rule SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(del(max(cons(x, xs)), cons(x, xs))) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x, xs)), x), max(cons(x, xs)), x, xs))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ Narrowing

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x, xs)), x), max(cons(x, xs)), x, xs))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule SORT(cons(x, xs)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x, xs)), x), max(cons(x, xs)), x, xs)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), max(cons(x0, nil)), x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, nil)), x0), x0, x0, nil))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ Narrowing
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ Rewriting

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), max(cons(x0, nil)), x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, nil)), x0), x0, x0, nil))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [LPAR04] the rule SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0, cons(x1, x2))) at position [0,1] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ Narrowing
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ Rewriting
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ Rewriting

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), max(cons(x0, nil)), x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, nil)), x0), x0, x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [LPAR04] the rule SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2))) at position [0,0,0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ Narrowing
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ Rewriting
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ Rewriting
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ Rewriting

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), max(cons(x0, nil)), x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, nil)), x0), x0, x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [LPAR04] the rule SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), max(cons(x0, nil)), x0, nil)) at position [0,1] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), x0, x0, nil))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ Narrowing
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ Rewriting
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ Rewriting
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ Rewriting
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ Rewriting

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, nil)), x0), x0, x0, nil))
SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), x0, x0, nil))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By rewriting [LPAR04] the rule SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(max(cons(x0, nil)), x0), x0, x0, nil)) at position [0,0,0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), x0, x0, nil))



↳ ITRS
  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ UsableRulesProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QReductionProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ Rewriting
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ Narrowing
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ Rewriting
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ Rewriting
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ Rewriting
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ Rewriting
                                              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SORT(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2))) → SORT(if2(equal_int(if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0), if1(greatereq_int(x0, x1), x0, x1, x2), x0, cons(x1, x2)))
SORT(cons(x0, nil)) → SORT(if2(equal_int(x0, x0), x0, x0, nil))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

if1(true, x, y, xs) → max(cons(x, xs))
if1(false, x, y, xs) → max(cons(y, xs))
max(cons(x, cons(y, xs))) → if1(greatereq_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
max(cons(x, nil)) → x
del(x, cons(y, xs)) → if2(equal_int(x, y), x, y, xs)
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → true
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → false
equal_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
equal_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → equal_int(pos(x), pos(y))
equal_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → equal_int(neg(x), neg(y))
if2(false, x, y, xs) → cons(y, del(x, xs))
if2(true, x, y, xs) → xs
del(x, nil) → nil
greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → true
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → true
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(x), pos(s(y))) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greatereq_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greatereq_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greatereq_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

del(x0, nil)
max(cons(x0, cons(x1, x2)))
if2(false, x0, x1, x2)
del(x0, cons(x1, x2))
max(cons(x0, nil))
if1(true, x0, x1, x2)
if2(true, x0, x1, x2)
if1(false, x0, x1, x2)
max(nil)
greatereq_int(pos(x0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(0), neg(x0))
greatereq_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
greatereq_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greatereq_int(neg(x0), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greatereq_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greatereq_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
equal_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.